Risk scenario or behavioral lab
Connect risk budgets, sizing, concentration, hedges, exits, loss response, and behavioral commitments to observable portfolio decisions.
In this behavioral finance course lab, students define limits, sizing, exits, hedges, and decision rules in advance—then compare those commitments with discretionary choices and observed portfolio behavior.
Ask students to state risk limits and decision rules before market movement tests whether those commitments survive.
Connect risk budgets, sizing, concentration, hedges, exits, loss response, and behavioral commitments to observable portfolio decisions.
Students establish limits and intervention rules, operate a virtual portfolio, record deviations, and explain whether new evidence justified them.
No coding is required. Students should understand the course's risk measures, diversification concepts, and behavioral-bias framework.
Use allocations, position sizes, trade history, supported exits, alerts, strategy rules, multi-asset scenarios, and optional contests.
Grade the stated risk budget, control rationale, observed choices, documented interventions, bias diagnosis, and policy revision.
Use external tools for full VaR engines, stress libraries, counterparty risk, credit models, regulation, and institutional reporting.
Virtual portfolios create a record of what students intended, what they did, and how they explain the difference.
Identify concentration, direction, leverage, currency, derivative, event, and model risks relevant to the exercise.
State position size, trade limits, stops or exits, diversification, and hedge conditions before outcomes are known.
Observe loss aversion, overconfidence, anchoring, disposition, herding, and action bias in decision journals.
Compare discretionary and rules-based behavior without assuming that the highest short-run return was best.
Give each team the same starting capital and require explicit position, sector, trade, and loss constraints.
Students state entry, exit, invalidation, and review rules before a virtual trade, then log any deviation.
Run comparable portfolios with discretionary decisions and supported strategy rules to study consistency and bias.
Identify a portfolio exposure and compare a smaller position, diversification, or supported derivative hedge.
Use supported forex or public-market instruments to observe response to a macro event and document risk-policy choices.
Code a decision log for anchoring, disposition, confirmation, and action bias; connect each observation to portfolio history.
Define the mandate, material risks, risk appetite, constraints, and how each exposure will be observed.
Specify size, limits, exits, hedges, review frequency, and acceptable reasons to override the policy.
Operate the virtual portfolio, record interventions, and tag possible behavioral influences.
Compare policy and behavior, separate luck from process, and propose a better control framework.
Virtual positions cannot fully reproduce liquidity, operational, counterparty, settlement, legal, tax, or behavioral pressure from real capital. Use instructor-provided scenarios and analytics for risks outside platform scope.
Yes. Instructors can use separate virtual portfolios or a manual portfolio alongside a supported visual or Python strategy, then require a common decision journal.
No. Use Investfly for positions, trades, controls, strategy behavior, and simulated outcomes alongside instructor-selected risk models and analytics.
Yes. Independent virtual portfolios, pre-commitment journals, and controlled comparison assignments often support behavioral learning better than rank-based competition.
Create a free instructor account and shape the lab around the exposures, controls, and behavioral questions your course emphasizes.
Virtual portfolios simplify many real-market risks and remain hypothetical simulations.