Applied module or semester project
Connect security screening and investment theses to sizing, virtual positions, monitoring, and post-decision review.
Use Investfly as an investment portfolio simulator for students: move from a broad market universe to documented selection criteria, virtual positions, strategy tests, and an evidence-based review—without reducing the course to a leaderboard.
Use this snapshot to judge fit before reviewing the detailed labs and project sequence below.
Connect security screening and investment theses to sizing, virtual positions, monitoring, and post-decision review.
Students screen a stock or ETF universe, defend one candidate, place a virtual trade, and review the thesis against observed evidence.
Students should understand basic securities, return, risk, diversification, and course-defined valuation or analysis methods.
Use screeners, watchlists, charts, fundamentals, indicators, positions, orders, and trade history; strategy tools are optional.
Grade the reproducibility of the screen, quality of reasoning, portfolio context, invalidation logic, and reflective revision.
Investfly is not an accounting model, institutional research terminal, or substitute for instructor-approved datasets.
Catalog naming varies by institution. These recurring titles share a practical research-and-decision layer Investfly can support.
Investfly makes the path from information to action visible enough to critique, repeat, and improve.
Translate a broad idea into explicit fundamental, technical, price, or market-cap criteria.
Use screens, charts, indicators, watchlists, and supporting analysis to defend why a security belongs.
Choose position size and portfolio context instead of stopping at a buy/sell opinion.
Use trade history and observed performance to compare initial expectations with what followed.
Begin with a broad stock or ETF universe. Students define successive filters, record exclusions, and submit a final watchlist with a short rationale.
Require an investment thesis, supporting evidence, invalidation condition, target allocation, and virtual trade in the same assignment.
Build two selection processes, hold other constraints constant, and compare the resulting candidates and portfolio decisions.
Create a watchlist before a scheduled market or company event, document expectations, then review price and portfolio behavior afterward.
Manage one portfolio discretionarily and encode the core selection or exit logic as supported strategy rules for comparison.
Teams present candidates, allocate a shared virtual mandate, monitor decisions, and defend changes using portfolio and trade evidence.
Specify the objective, eligible instruments, benchmark, horizon, constraints, and screening logic.
Submit the watchlist, thesis, evidence, material risks, and conditions that would invalidate the idea.
Place the virtual trade, explain sizing, and monitor the position alongside competing opportunities.
Use trade and performance evidence to distinguish process quality from favorable or unfavorable outcomes.
Investfly complements valuation models, financial-statement work, readings, and instructor-provided datasets. It is not a replacement for an accounting model, institutional research terminal, or academic factor-research environment.
Yes. Instructors can design exercises that combine supported fundamental fields, technical filters, charts, standard or custom indicators, and qualitative research supplied outside the platform.
No. A contest is optional. Students can use independent virtual portfolios for research memos, mandate-based projects, team investment committees, or longer observation assignments.
It can support the public-security research, virtual portfolio, team decision, and review portions of an investment lab. It does not replace institutional custody, compliance, or real-fund operations.
Create a free instructor account and shape the exercise around your course level, instruments, and assessment style.
Simulation limitations and current data, instrument, and plan availability apply.